According to the art: Michel Foucault digs into the history of madness from the sixteenth century to the nineteenth century western Europe and the U.S. This period corresponds roughly from the time when “madmen were allowed to wander in the open countryside,” through a period of exclusionary practices, and until the “birth of the asylum.”
Projects So That I Can Say More
According to the art: I compare s classic biomedical description of insomnia with excerpts from Samantha Harvey’s book that concerns how severe insomnia affected her.
According to the art: The book is a deep and ranging analysis of insomnia causes, consequences, and fixes in the midst of daily life as the author experiences it. She emphasizes the effects insomnia has on her being.
According to the art: Stegenga offers a book-length and formal philosophical explanation using Bayes Theorem on why “we should have little confidence in the effectiveness of medical interventions.”
According to the art: The director Mike Leigh is asking viewers to consider more than whether abortion is right or wrong prima facie. He is forcing viewers to bring in motive as a qualifying factor to the rightness and wrongness of abortion.
Projects So That I Can Say More
According to the art: I compare a classic medical text description of a retinal hemorrhage from StatPearls with a literary description from the novel Seeing Red.
According to the art: The story follows the plight of a young, diabetic woman experiencing a retinal hemorrhage and what comes after clinically and socially. What a retinal hemorrhage is like as it occurs and what the prospect of blindness is like afterward are featured. How both can become a proof of love is intertwined.
According to the art: To adapt Beth Macy’s expansive book about the opioid crisis to the format of a dramatic series, the creator, Danny Strong, had to limit his scope around the fiendish Purdue Pharma sales and marketing practices and the people they affected directly.
According to the art: This novel is for readers who want to go deep into what people—family, organ recipients, hospital staff—experience during organ transplantation, from the time of an event making organ transplantation possible to the time a donated organ is implanted. In particular, philosophical concepts and language constraints are considered.
According to the art: The book might have been better titled, The Problems of Alzheimer’s, to better reflect the multiple dimensions Jason Karlawish takes into account in his study of the disease. Karlawish functions more as critic than cheerleader, and more as an arbiter than polemicist. He is only a polemicist when criticizing the polemics around various controversies he considers.